SİBER VE DİJİTAL KRİMİNOLOJİ ALANINDA ETİK ADALET ÜZERİNE DÜŞÜNMEK

Yazarlar

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Uluslararası Hukuk- Siber ve dijital adli soruşturmalar- etik- hukuk felsefesi ve sosyolojisi

Özet

Dijital Adli Tıp soruşturmaları, kanıt toplamak için siber ve dijital ortamları araştırmaya yönelik bilimsel ve yasal süreci işaret eden bir kavramdır. Dolayısıyla hukuk biliminin ve adalet ilkelerinin teorisi ve felsefesinin dikkate alınması önemlidir. Dijital kanıtların mahkemede yasal olarak kabul edilebilir olması için kanıtların gerçek, doğru, eksiksiz ve jüri için ikna edici olması gerektiği en temel kabuldür. Yetersiz gözetim zinciri, yasal prosedürlerin uygulanmaması ve yetersiz delil bütünlüğü gibi faktörler mahkemede dijital adli kanıt sunmanın kabul edilemez olduğu durumlardır.
Bunun yanında siber destekli suçlar artıyor ve kolluk kuvvetleri, inceleme ve tespit faaliyetlerinin çoğunu dijital alana genişletmek zorunda kaldı. Suçluların kovuşturulmasını sağlamak için kullanılabilecek daha fazla kanıt ortaya çıkarılabiliyor olması nedeni ile dijital adli alan yıllar içinde çok daha karmaşık hale geldi. Hükümetler de şüpheli kişileri takip etmeye yönelik bu dijital kanıtları benimsemiş durumdalar. Bu nedenle adli tıp müfettişleri, bir mahkumiyet sözkonusu olduğunda kolluk kuvvetlerine yeterli kanıt sağlamak için baskı altında olduklarından, kapsamlı bir şekilde veri toplamaya yönlendirilmiş durumdalar. Bu bakımdan soruşturmaların etiği ve adaleti hakkında uluslararası alanda çeşitli endişeler var. Etik temelli dijital adli tekniklerle ilgili tartışmalar uluslararası hukuk merkezlidir ve kavramların daha ziyade uluslararası geçerliliği ve uygulanabilirliği vardır. Kısıtlamasız soruşturmalarda, soruşturulanların yasal mahremiyet hakları dijital kanıt toplama ve soruşturmaları sırasında kolayca ihlal edilebilir. Toplumsal düzeyde, böylesi bir uygulama
adaletsizlik duygusuna neden olacaktır. Bu sunumun odak noktası, dijital adli araştırmaların süreci değil, bunların adaletsiz olarak algılanma potansiyelleri konu edilmektedir. Bu nedenle dijital adli soruşturmalara etik temelli, bireylerin mahremiyet haklarına saygılı ve aynı zamanda kolluk kuvvetlerinin ihtiyaçlarını kabul eden bir yaklaşım gerektiğine dair tartışmalar ortaya konulmaktadır.

Referanslar

ACPO.(2014). ACPO Good Practice Guide for Digital Evidence. https://www.digital-detective.net/acpo-good-practice-guide-for-digital-evidence/, (Erişim Tarihi: 10. 9.2021)

Adedayo M. Balogun, & Tranos Zuva. (2017). Open Ethıcal Issues In Dıgıtal Forensıc Systems. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, 9(1).

Airlie, Robertson, J., Krosch, M. N., & Brooks, E. (2021). Contemporary issues in forensic science—Worldwide survey results. Forensic Science International, 320, 110704–110704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110704.

Akyeşilmen, Nezir. (2021). İnsan Hakları Hukuku, Siyaseti ve Felsefesi, Siber Teknolojinin İnsan Haklarına Etkisi, Orion Kitabevi, Ankara.

Almuhaideb, & Saeed, S. (2021). A Process-Based Approach to ABET Accreditation: A Case Study of a Cybersecurity and Digital Forensics Program. Journal of Information Systems Education, 32(2), 119–133.

Angel, & Seaman Kelly, J. (2020). Forensic Document Examination in the 21st Century. Taylor & Francis Group.

Aretoulakis, E. (2016). Forbidden aesthetics, ethical justice, and terror in modern western culture. Lexington Books.

Balogun, A., & Zuva, T. (2017). Open Ethical Issues In Digital Forensic Systems. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/440434

Burton, Chase Smith. (2019). Republican Monsters: The Cultural Construction of American Positivist Criminology, 1767-1920; https://escholarship.org/content/qt1bb046x0/qt1bb046x0.pdf?t=q6z2ja, (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2022)

Casey, E., & Zehnder, A. (2021). Inter‐regional digital forensic knowledge management: needs, challenges, and solutions. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 66(2), 619–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14613

Casey, E., Ferraro, M., & Nguyen, L. (2009). Investigation Delayed Is Justice Denied: Proposals for Expediting Forensic Examinations of Digital Evidence. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 54(6), 1353–1364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01150.x

Castillo, M. (2008). Digital forensics and the American Journal of Neuroradiology. American Journal of Neuroradiology : AJNR, 29(2), 211–212. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0914

Criminology’? International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 6(2): 17‐33. DOI:

Digital Forensics and Social Media: ethics, challenges and opportunities. (2019). European Union News.

Ethics in forensic science: Renewed commitments and a call for papers across the Forensic Science International family. (2021). Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 37, 301207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2021.301207

Ferguson, R. ., Renaud, K., Wilford, S., & Irons, A. (n.d.). PRECEPT: a framework for ethical digital forensics investigations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(2), 257–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-05-2019-0097

Forensic Focus. (2021). MSAB’s Henrik Tjernberg On Ethics In Digital Forensics And Consumer Privacy. In Forensic Focus [BLOG]. Newstex.

Guidance Software EnCase[R] Wins 2014 SC Awards Europe for Best Computer Forensics Solution. (2014). In Computer Weekly News. NewsRX LLC.; EnCase[R] eDiscovery v5 Empowers Legal Departments with Comprehensive Oversight of the Entire E-Discovery Process. (2012). In Computer Weekly News (p. 1751). NewsRX LLC.

Hall, R. A. S., Dennis, C. B., & Chipman, T. (2000). The ethical foundations of criminal justice. CRC Press.

Hasan, Zheng, Y., & Walker, J. T. (2020). Digital Forensics Education Modules for Judicial Officials. In National Cyber Summit (NCS) Research Track 2020 (pp. 46–60). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58703-1_3

Hirst, C. S., White, S., & Smith, S. E. (2018). Standardisation in 3D Geometric Morphometrics: Ethics, Ownership, and Methods. Archaeologies, 14(2), 272–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-018-9349-7

Holt, T. J., Bossler, A. M., & Seigfried-Spellar, K. C. (2018). Cybercrime and Digital Forensics (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315296975

https://adaylik.adalet.gov.tr/Resimler/160220211117siber-kriminoloji-egitim-modulupdf.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 10. 1.2022)

https://escholarship.org/content/qt1bb046x0/qt1bb046x0.pdf?t=q6z2ja, s.95 (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2022)

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jul/23/panopticon-digital-surveillance-jeremy-bentham. (Erişim Tarihi: 10. 9.2021)

https://www.top10cybersecurity.com. (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2022)

https://www.uab.edu/cas/news/faculty/item/5617-uab-professor-working-to-create-a-code-of-ethics-for-digital-forensics-professionals (Erişim Tarihi: 10. 1.2022)

https://www.ucl.ac.uk/anthropology/study/graduate-taught/digital-anthropology-msc (Erişim Tarihi: 10.11.2021).

ICO.(2018).Guide to General Data Protection Regulation. https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr-1-0.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 10. 9.2021)

Ijeh, A. C., & Curran, K. (2021). Crime Science and Digital Forensics. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429322877

Interpol.(2021). Forensic expertise and data is vital to international investigations.https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Forensics; Global Guidelines For Digital Forensics Laboratories, 2019 (Erişim Tarihi: 10. 1.2022)

John Wright and Matt DeLisi, “What Criminologists Don’t Say, and Why.” City Journal Summer 2017: https://www.city-journal.org/html/what-criminologists-dont-say-and-why-15328.html. (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2022)

Johnson, C., & Davies, R. (2020). Using Digital Forensic Techniques to Identify Contract Cheating: A Case Study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09358-w

Journal of digital forensic practice. (2006). Taylor and Francis.

Kathryn C Seigfried-Spellar, Marcus K Rogers, & Danielle M Crimmins. (2017). Development Of A Professıonal Code Of Ethıcs In Dıgıtal Forensıcs. Proceedings of the Conference on Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 135–144.

Kavrestad, J. (2020). Fundamentals of Digital Forensics (2nd ed. 2020). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38954-3

Kruger. (2020). Covert positivism in forensic domains. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 9(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v9i2.1120

Kumar, G., Saha, R., Lal, C., & Conti, M. (2021). Internet-of-Forensic (IoF): A blockchain based digital forensics framework for IoT applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 120, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.02.016

Le-Khac, N.-A., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2020). Cyber and Digital Forensic Investigations. Springer International Publishing AG.

Luban, D. (2018). Lawyers and justice : an ethical study. Princeton University Press.

Marcella, A. J. (2021). Cyber Forensics. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003057888

Mária, & Ubomír, S. (2019). Colorful bones - Can be histology useful for forensic anthropology in the digital era? Soudni Lekarstvi, 64(3), 28–30.

Mawgoud, Albusuny, A., Abu-Talleb, A., & Tawfik, B. S. (2021). Localization of Facial Images Manipulation in Digital Forensics via Convolutional Neural Networks. In Enabling Machine Learning Applications in Data Science (ss. 313–325). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6129-4_22

McDermid. (2015). Forensics : what bugs, burns, prints, DNA, and more tell us about crime. Grove Press.

McMullan,T.(2015). What does the panopticon mean in the age of digital surveillance?. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jul/23/panopticon-digital-surveillance-jeremy-bentham (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2022).

Michael M Losavio, & Antonio Losavio. (2017). Downstream Competence Challenges And Legal/Ethıcal Rısks In Dıgıtal Forensıcs. Proceedings of the Conference on Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 167–178.

Miller, D. (2018). Digital anthropology. https://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/digital-anthropology (Erişim Tarihi: 10.11.2021)

Mishra, & Mishra, S. (2020). Adaptiveness of Traditional Judicial Systems to Digital Forms of Evidence. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 10(2), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.B2112.1210220

Mooney. (2020). The positivist revolution, physiognomy, phrenology and the science of ‘Othering’ In The Theoretical Foundations of Criminology (1st ed., pp. 83–131). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429322723-4

Muda, Choo, Y.-H., Abraham, A., & Srihari, S. N. (2014). Computational intelligence in digital forensics (Vol. 1). Springer.

Nolasco Braaten, & Vaughn, M. S. (2021). Convenience Theory of Cryptocurrency Crime: A Content Analysis of U.S. Federal Court Decisions. Deviant Behavior, 42(8), 958–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2019.1706706.

Oettinger, W. (2020). Learn Computer Forensics. Packt Publishing, Limited.

Pathos, Physiognomy and Ekphrasis from Aristotle to the Second Sophistic, in: C. Johnson & A. Stavru (eds.), Visualizing the Invisible with the Human Body: Physiognomy and Ekphrasis in the Ancient World, de Gruyter, Berlin 2019, 143-160.

Quick, D., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2018). Big Digital Forensic Data. Springer Singapore Pte. Limited.

Roussev, V. (2017). Digital forensic science : issues, methods, and challenges. Morgan & Claypool.

ROUX, B., & FALGOUST, M. (2012). Ethical Issues Raised by Data Acquisition Methods in Digital Forensics Research. Journal of Information Ethics, 21(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.21.1.40

Rowe, Neil.C. Privacy Concerns With Digital Forensics. (2019). In Cyber Law, Privacy, and Security: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1464–1481). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8897-9.ch073

Sachowski, J. (2019). Implementing Digital Forensic Readiness. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429441363.

Sachowski. (2016). Implementing Digital Forensic Readiness (1st edition). Elsevier Science & Technology Books.

Schiller. (2017). The Face is (Not) Like a Mirror: The Advertising Rhetoric of the Catoptric Metaphor from the Art of Physiognomy to the Science of Facial Expression. International Journal of Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric, 1(2), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSVR.2017070103

Sharevski, F. (2015). Rules of professional responsibility in digital forensics: A comparative analysis. The Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 10(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.15394/jdfsl.2015.1201.

Siber Suçlara Karşı Uluslararası İşbirliği hakkında Siber Suç Modülü https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/cybercrime/module-7/index.html(Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2022)

Siegal JA (2012) Ethics in Forensic Science (Downs JCU, Swienton AR eds). Elsevier Ireland Ltd., pp 59–79 doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-385019-5.00003-8

Sloan,J.(2015). UAB Professor Working to Create a Code of Ethics for Digital Forensics Professionals.

Squires, K., Errickson, D., & Márquez-Grant, N. (2020). Ethical Approaches to Human Remains. Springer International Publishing AG.

Stavru. (2019). Pathos, physiognomy and ekphrasis from Aristotle to the Second Sophistic. In Visualizing the invisible with the human body (Vol. 10, pp. 143–160). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110642698-007

Stratton G, Powell A and Cameron R (2017). Crime and Justice in Digital Society: Towards a ‘Digital ‘Digital Criminology’?. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 6(2), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v6i2.355

Sue Black Catches Paedophiles by Looking at the Marks on Their Hands (2018). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qjqa8oTikP8

Supreme Court.(2018). Supreme Court of the United States.https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-402_h315.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 10. 1.2022)

Terras, M. (2020). Adventures in Digital Cultural Heritage.

Turvey, B. E., & Crowder, S. (2013). Ethical Justice. Elsevier Science & Technology.

UNODC.(2019). International Cooperation against Cybercrime

Vasile Lapadusi, & Ramona Dobreanu. (2014). Consıderatıons Physıognomy/Consıderatıı Prıvınd Fızıognomıa. Romanian Journal of Forensic Science (English Ed.), 15(92), 1621.

Yadav P. K. (2017). Ethical issues across different fields of forensic science. Egyptian journal of forensic sciences, 7(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-017-0010-1; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514178/

Yoshino, Noguchi, K., Atsuchi, M., Kubota, S., Imaizumi, K., Thomas, C. D. L., & Clement, J. G. (2002). Individual identification of disguised faces by morphometrical matching. Forensic Science International, 127(1-2), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00115-9

Yuadi, D. Artaria, M., Sakina, & Taufiq Asyhari, A. (2021). Digital Forensics for Skulls Classification in Physical Anthropology Collection Management. Computers, Materials & Continua, 68(3), 3979–3995. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2021.015417

İndir

Yayınlanmış

2022-01-30

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

ÜMÜTLÜ, A. Y. (2022). SİBER VE DİJİTAL KRİMİNOLOJİ ALANINDA ETİK ADALET ÜZERİNE DÜŞÜNMEK. Siber Politikalar Dergisi, 6(12), 182-201. Geliş tarihi gönderen http://cyberpolitikjournal.org/index.php/main/article/view/143

Sayı

Bölüm

Araştırma Makaleleri