DIGITAL SHIELD: THE PROTECTIVE ROLE AGAINST HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN CYBER INTERVENTIONS
Keywords:
Cyber, Humanitarian Response, Responsibility to Protect, R2PAbstract
Atrocity crimes represent some of the most severe violations of international order and are primarily addressed within the framework of humanitarian intervention and the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). Traditional military interventions have been widely criticized due to their potential infringement on state sovereignty and the high risk of operational failure, whereas emerging digital technologies have introduced cyber humanitarian intervention as a possible alternative. The aim of this article is to explore the potential of cyber operations in preventing or halting mass atrocity crimes within the context of R2P and to critically assess the legal, ethical, and practical constraints of this approach.
Methodologically, the study adopts a normative analytical framework, drawing on international law, cybersecurity, and humanitarian intervention scholarship to establish a conceptual and legal basis. Existing literature tends to focus predominantly on military or diplomatic means of intervention, with only limited engagement with the notion of cyber humanitarian intervention. This gap highlights the need for a comprehensive assessment of how cyber measures align with international law, their feasibility, and associated risks. The findings suggest that cyber interventions may support the implementation of R2P by safeguarding access to information, protecting communication infrastructures, and limiting the digital capacities of perpetrators. Nevertheless, the approach also entails significant limitations, particularly concerning state sovereignty, attribution challenges, the lack of international cooperation, and ethical accountability. In conclusion, while cyber humanitarian intervention does not constitute a definitive solution on its own, it can be considered a complementary tool for enhancing the effective realization of the R2P principle.
References
Abels, J. (2024). Private Infrastructure in Geopolitical Conflicts: The Case of Starlink and The War in Ukraine. European Journal of International Relations, 30(4), 842–866.
Akyeşilmen, N. (2018a). Disiplinlerarası Bir Yaklaşımla Siber Politika & Güvenlik. Ankara: Orion Kitabevi.
Akyeşilmen, N. (2018b). Cyber Good Governance: A New Challenge in International Power Politics?. Cyberpolitik Journal, 3(5-6), 2-21.
Al Jazzeera. (2024). Hezbollah Walkie-talkies Exploded Too, What to Know about Israel’s Attacks. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/9/18/more-devices-exploding-across-lebanon-whats-happening
Alexander, K. (2024). The limits of international law: the Responsibility to Protect (R2P), Israel and the International Court of Justice. https://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/en/commentaries/the-limits-of-international-law-the-responsibility-to-protect-r2p-israel-and-the-international-court-of-justice/
Al-Rawi, A. (2016). Video Games, Terrorism, and ISIS’s Jihad 3.0. Terrorism and Political Violence, 30(4), 740–760.
Amnesty International. (2022). Myanmar: Facebook’s systems promoted violence against Rohingya; Meta owes reparations – new report. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/09/myanmar-facebooks-systems-promoted-violence-against-rohingya-meta-owes-reparations-new-report/ (Erişim Tarihi: 17.01.2025)
Badescu, C. G. (2011). Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: Security and Human Rights. Abingdon: Routledge.
Balkin, J. M. (2012). The First Amendment is an Information Policy. Hofstra Law Review, 41(1), 1-41.
BM. (2012). Framework of Analysis for Atrocity Crimes A Tool for Prevention. https://www.globalr2p.org/resources/framework-of-analysis-for-atrocity-crimes-a-tool-for-prevention/
Coady, C. A. J., Dobos, N. and Sanyal, S. (2018). Challenges for Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical Demand and Political Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, D. and Bar’el, O. (2017). The Use of Cyberwarfare in Influence Operations. Yuval Ne’eman Workshop for Science, Technology and Security. https://en-cyber.tau.ac.il/sites/cyberstudies-english.tau.ac.il/files/media_server/cyber%20center/cyber-center/Cyber_Cohen_Barel_ENG.pdf
Conklin, A. (2025). Los Angeles Wildfires: Elon Musk Personally Delivers Starlinks to California First Responders. https://www.foxnews.com/us/los-angeles-wildfires-elon-musk-personally-delivers-starlink-satellites-california-first-responders
Deng, F. (2010). From Sovereignty as Responsibility' to the Responsibility to Protect. Global Responsibility to Protect, 2(4), 353-370.
Evans, G. (2008). The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and For All. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
Freedom House. (2012). Freedom on the Net 2012 – Libya. https://www.refworld.org/reference/annualreport/freehou/2012/en/88761
Gilligan, E. (2013). Redefining Humanitarian Intervention: The Historical Challenge of R2P. Journal of Human Rights, 12(1), 21–39.
Gulati, J. and Khosa, I. (2013). Humanitarian Inter Humanitarian Intervention: Tention: To Protect State So otect State Sovereignty. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 41(3), 397-416.
Güler, A. (2015). İnsani Müdahale Aracı Olarak Siber Uzay. Medeniyet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(4), 139-149.
Healey, J. (2016). Winning and Losing in Cyberspace. N.Pissanidis, H.Rõigas, M.Veenendaal (Eds.). 8th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: Defending the Core. Talinn: CCD COE.
Heller, A. (2020). Israeli cyber chief: Major attack on water systems thwarted. https://www.aronheller.com/articles/israeli-cyber-chief-major-attack-on-water-systems-thwarted/
Helwani, I. (2024). Cyberactivism in Syria: Emergence, Transformation, Potentials, and Limitations. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, 20(48), 239-263.
Henkin, L. (1999). Kosovo and The Law of “Humanitarian Intervention”. American Journal of International Law, 93(4), 824-828.
Hou, Z., Qu, Y., Zhang, L., Liu, J., Wang, F., Yu, Q., ... and Zhou, C. (2024). War City Profiles Drawn from Satellite Images. Nature Cities, 1(5), 1-11.
ICISS. (2001). The Responsibility to Protect. https://www.globalr2p.org/resources/the-responsibility-to-protect-report-of-the-international-commission-on-intervention-and-state-sovereignty-2001/
Illingworth, R. (2024). Not the ‘Fairest Norm of Them All’ but Still Needed: On Hobson and Criticism of the Responsibility to Protect. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 18(2), 181–190.
Kallber, J. (2016). Humanitarian Cyber Operations. IEEE Tchnology and Society Magazine, https://cyber.army.mil/Portals/3/Documents/publications/external/Humanitarian%20Cyber%20Operations.pdf?ver=2017-09-26-135216-070
Kardaş, Ş. (2003). Humanitarian Intervention: A Conceptual Analysis. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 2(3&4), 21-49.
Kellow, C. L and Steeves, H. L. (1998). The Role of Radio in the Rwandan Genocide. Journal of Communication, 48(3), 107-128.
Li, Y. and Liu, Q. (2021). A Comprehensive Review Study of Cyber-Attacks and Cyber Security; Emerging Trends and Recent Developments. Energy Reports, 7, 8176-8186.
Liff, A. P. (2012). Cyberwar: A New ‘Absolute Weapon’? The Proliferation of Cyberwarfare Capabilities and Interstate War. Journal of Strategic Studies, 35(3), 401–428.
Lin, H. (2019). The Existential Threat from Cyber-Enabled Information Warfare. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 75(4), 187–196.
Massingham, E. (2009). Military Intervention for Humanitarian Purposes: Does The Responsibility to Protect Doctrine Advance the Legality of the Use of Force for Humanitarian Ends? International Review of the Red Cross, 91(876), 803-831.
Neilsen, R. (2021). Cyber Humanitarian Interventions: the Viability and Ethics of Using Cyber-operations to Disrupt Perpetrators’ Means and Motivations for Atrocities in the Digital Age. PhD Thesis, UNSW Australia.
Norris, P. (2011). Developments in High Resolution Imaging Satellites for the Military. Space Policy, 27, 44-47.
Norton, R. and Capella, P. (1999). Bill for Kosovo war goes over £30bn. https://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/oct/15/balkans
Paterson, T. and Hanley, L. (2020). Political Warfare in The Digital Age: Cyber Subversion, Information Operations and ‘Deep Fakes.’ Australian Journal of International Affairs, 74(4), 439–454.
Pattison J. (2020). From Defence to Offence: the Ethics of Private Cybersecurity. European Journal of International Security, 5(2): 233-254.
Pellerin, C. (2011). Dod Releases First Strategy for Operating in Cyberspace. https://www.army.mil/article/61720/dod_releases_first_strategy_for_operating_in_cyberspace
Raston, D. T. (2019). How the U.S. Hacked ISIS. https://www.npr.org/2019/09/26/763545811/how-the-u-s-hacked-isis?t=1582468821601
Rid, T. (2011). Cyber War Will Not Take Place. Journal of Strategic Studies, 35(1), 5–32.
Roberts, G. W. (2000). Humanitarian Intervention: Definitions And Criteria. CSS Strategic Briefing Papers, 3(1), 1-2.
Roscini, M. (2014). Cyber Operastions and The Use of Force in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stone, J. (2012). Cyber War Will Take Place! Journal of Strategic Studies, 36(1), 101–108.
Thomas, T. (2014). Russia’s Information Warfare Strategy: Can the Nation Cope in Future Conflicts? The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 27(1), 101–130.
Uitermark, J. (2016). Complex Contention: Analyzing Power Dynamics within Anonymous. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 403–417.
United Nations General Assembly. (2009). Implementing the Responsibility to Protect. Report of the Secretary-General, https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n09/206/10/pdf/n0920610.pdf
Wheeler, N. J. (2000). Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Willett, M. (2024). A Short History of Cyber Operations. Adelphi Series, 64(511–513), 63–104.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
