INVENTING OUR SUCCESSORS: RATIONALIZING INNOVATIONS IN TECHNOLOGY AND THE TRAJECTORY OF HUMAN MISANTHROPIC BEHAVIOUR
Keywords:
Cyber Philosophy, Misanthropic Behaviour, AI, innovation, robotics, software platformsAbstract
This paper is designed to explicate the parallels of technological innovation and human misanthropic behavior. Humanity's continuous and historical predilection for war and conflict has been augmented by human-created technologies like artificial intelligence, automation, robotics, and software platforms. The ontological question is asked, does technology have the ability to take the initiative to use human beings, altering the human-machine relationship as machines to develop the misanthropic behaviors on the behalf of its human inventors, quickening the possibility of megadeath by nuclear war, pandemic, or total extinction? The problem is first separated into parts by the process of philosophical deconstruction, then a set of proposed solutions are presented.
References
References
Bartoletti, I. (2020). An artificial revolution on power, politics and Ai. The Indigo Press.
Eckersley, R. (2021). International relations theories: discipline and diversity. (T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith, Eds.). Oxford University Press.
Eliot, L. (2020, May 16). Tesla Lawsuit Over Autopilot Engaged Pedestrian Death Could Disrupt Automated Driving Progress. Bloomberg
Erskine, T. (2021). International relations theories: discipline and diversity. (T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith, Eds.). Oxford University Press.
Greenberg, A. (2020). Sandworm. Random House US.
Heidegger, M., & Lovitt, W. (1977). The question concerning technology. Harper & Row.
Hobbes, T., Johnston, D., & Hoekstra, K. (2021). Leviathan. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Jung, C. G. (1980). The archetypes and the collective unconscious. Princeton University Press.
Lee, K.-F. (2018). Ai superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the new world order. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Lindsey, N. (2019, November 19). Voluntary Disclosure of Cybersecurity Risks Mitigates Contagion Effect with Investors. CPO Magazine .
Manjikian, M. (2021). Introduction to cyber politics and policy. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Modaresnezhad, M., & Nemati, H. (2020). Participatory Sensing or Sensing of Participation. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 16(3), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijthi.2020070108
Moss, E., & Metcalf, J. (2019, November 14). The Ethical Dilemma at the Heart of Big Companies. Harvard Busness Review.
Naser, S. (2015). Religion, Reason and War: A Study in the Ideological Sources of Political Intolerance and Bellicosity(thesis).
National Institute of Health (NIH). (2015). Biology of Addiction: Drugs and Alcohol Can Hijack Your Brain. Washington, DC; US Department of Health and Human Services.
Office of Air Force History, Headquarters USAF. (M. D. Wright & L. J. Paszek, Eds.), Science Technology, and Warfare1–209 (1969). Washington , DC; US Government Printing Office.
Sambaluk, N. M. (2015). The other space race Eisenhower and the quest for aerospace security. Naval Institute Press.
Scharre, P. (2019). Army of none: autonomous weapons and the future of war. W. W. Norton & Company.
Shostack, A. (2014). Threat modeling: designing for security. Wiley Publishing.
Strauss, L. (2010). The city and man. The University of Chicago Press.
What are jus ad bellum and jus in bello? International Committee of the Red Cross. (2015, January 22). https://www.icrc.org/en/document/what-are-jus-ad-bellum-and-jus-bello-0.
Wright, M. D., & Paszek, L. J., Science, technology, and warfare: proceedings. (1971). Washington?; Office of Air Force History, Headquarters USAF.
Yampolskiy, R. V., & Fox, J. (2012). Artificial General Intelligence and the Human Mental Model. The Frontiers Collection, 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32560-1_7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Cyberpolitik Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
